Links for November 5th

Tim Ferris discusses why he is deciding to take a break from investing in startups, how to say “no” to meeting with new people that are taking up lots of his time and effort, and how to use his experience to make better life choices.

Link: How to Say “No” When It Matters Most


Great short read about why for-profit schools have been doing so well, what the real effect these schools have been having on our economy, and how the government is cracking down on them.

Link: The Rise and Fall of For-Profit Schools


Great article that talks about what we look for in friends throughout the different periods of our lives and the things that pull us apart from even our closest of friends.

Link: How Friendships Change When You Become an Adult

Links for October 1st

There is so much going on with the market these days as the third quarter of 2015 has just ended with lots of volatility and big losses. Carl Icahn discusses his thoughts on the market in this video on the health of the economy and what scary times lie ahead.

Link: Danger Ahead by Carl Icahn


Ray Dalio is interviewed by Tom Keene and Mike McKee of Bloomberg and examines everything that is going on in the domestic and global markets. It is smart to watch this video along with Carl Icahn’s above in order to understand how they both currently see the markets and where their perspectives differ as they are two very big players in finance.

Link: Dalio on Fed Policy, Hedge Funds, and China

Links for June 24th

Giving a good and memorable toast is a great quality to have and can come in handy quite a lot, especially with the impending wedding season.

Link: Memorable Toasts


I am not saying that I fully agree with this article since I think one’s social circle merely changes as they go through the different stages of life rather than depletes but it’s an interesting article nonetheless.

Link: 8 Reasons Your Social Circle Dwindles


 

Wall Street Week is a show in which they feature an episode with hedge fund manager Leon Cooperman. He talks about four signals that he looks for that can cause bear markets and Ben Carlson sums them up as follows:

Cooperman’s take on the four reasons we typically see a bear market in stocks:

1. Stocks anticipate an on-coming recession
2. Euphoria and exuberance
3. An unpredictable geopolitical event
4. The Fed takes away the punch bowl by raising interest rates

Carlson then continues with an interesting point about the average investor who tries to predict all the big events.

Every investor would love to be able to sidestep the next correction or bear market. We’re averse to losses so everyone becomes infatuated with predicting the next market downturn. Instead of constantly trying to guess which direction the next 10-20% move in the market will be, investors would be better served by accepting losses with equanimity and having a plan in place to deal with the inevitable drawdowns.

I think this is a very important idea since, as he says, so many people want to be able to predict the next bubble, recession, or event. However, it is vital to keep in mind that it is extremely hard to predict an event and either way it is much better to be well prepared for the event whenever it may happen. Once one has a plan for their investments in preparation for bad times, then one may try to time it a little better but trying to cut it too close to bring it maximum profits may just cause great losses in the end.

Link: The Four Signs of a Pending Bear Market


 

Check out the music by The Piano Guys ! They perform all types of music and are really amazing! Linking below to their rendition of the Jurassic Park theme song.

Link: Jurassic Park Theme Song by The Piano Guys

Links for June 5th

There are three types of value investors, namely passive screeners, contrarians, and activists, and it is good to understand each and know where you fall. Then the presentation continues on to discuss seven myths of value investing that investors tend to overlook regarding things such as DCF valuation and beta risk.

Link: Omaha Value Investing

Related Link: Seven Value Myths Summarized by Value Walk


A very useful tool to help you figure out how much money you will need to earn and save in order to continue living your current lifestyle or adopt a new lifestyle. The tool goes through lifestyle choices dealing with cars, children, vacations, and shopping habits. Definitely worth going through just to get at least a minimal understanding of the differences that each and every lifestyle choice makes with regard to finances.

Link: How Much Will My Lifestyle Cost

 

Thinking Differently About Cash

Holding cash in one’s portfolio can be very controversial. Elliot Turner gives his ideas on how cash can be very beneficial for one’s portfolio and states that some people are just writing it off too quickly before considering it properly. However, the part of his post that I think is most important has to do with the actual ideas on how to view cash and how some investors perceive holding cash differently than others.

Alice Schroder discusses in another article how Warren Buffet looks at cash differently than most investors. Buffet’s approach to cash with regard to investing has to do with viewing it as a call option. To quote Schroder, “he thinks of cash differently than the conventional investors. This is one of the most important things I learned from him: the optionality of cash. He thinks of cash as a call option with no expiration date, an option on every asset class, with no strike price.” This approach is good because it doesn’t make one think of cash as an full fledged investment on its own. Rather, an alternative place to hold money while earning a small percentage on it and having it readily available for other investments.

The second approach has to do with Claude Shannon, the founder of information theory, and his ideas on how to invest in a random walk. In William Poundstone’s book, “Fortune’s Formula,” he discusses Shannon’s ideas on how to use cash in a portfolio to beat the random walk of a stock. The portfolio he talks about is counter-intuitive and may be tough for some investors to stomach, however, it has interesting payoffs for a stock that is highly volatile. It is a portfolio based on  50% invested in a stock and 50% in cash. Then as the price changes the investor would rebalance the portfolio at a specified time each day to ones again reflect the 50/50 proportion of stock and cash. This can be clarified by the example Poundstone gives in his book.

“Imagine you start with $1,000, $500 in stock and $500 in cash. Suppose the stock halves in price the first day. (It’s a really volatile stock.) This gives you a $750 portfolio with $250 in stock and $500 in cash. That is now lopsided in favor of cash. You rebalance by withdrawing $125 from the cash account to buy stock. This leaves you with a newly balanced mixed of $374 in stock and $375 cash.

“Now repeat. The next day, let’s say the stock doubles in price. The $375 in stock jumps to $750. With the #375 in the cash account, you have $1,125. This time, you sell some stock, ending up with $562.50 each in stock and cash.

“Look at what Shannon’s scheme has achieved so far. After a dramatic plunge, the stock’s price is back to where it began. A buy-and-hold investor would have no profit at all. Shannon’s investor has made $125.”

Both of these approaches seem to be a very interesting ways to think about using cash when investing in stocks or other assets. Whether it be thinking of cash as a call option as Warren Buffet or as a way of better allocating and reducing volatility as Claude Shannon, it is good to remember that there are always other ways of looking at things.

Link: In Defense of Cash

Related Link: Is the Cash Option Priceless for Warren Buffet

Related Books: Fortune’s Formula by William Poundstone

Links for May 29th

Very detailed paper on what works in investing with many studies used as evidence for Tweedy, Browne’s approach to investing. Full of lots of useful information and more than enough for weekend reading.

Link: What Has Worked in Investing: Studies of Investment Approaches and Characteristics Associated with Exceptional Returns


The Atlanta Fed has developed a tool, called myCPI, that will personalize the CPI data for you based on the information you give them on your demographic. They also included in the tool a useful option to help you keep on top of newly released CPI data by allowing you to input your email and getting an update whenever there is new data. Check out more information below or just skip the link and try it out here!

Link: myCPI: Getting More Personal with Inflation


An article about Richard Thaler and his fascination with behavioral economics and human nature. The article also discusses his recently released book called, “Misbehaving.”

Link: The Economist Who Realized How Crazy We Are

Related Book: Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics

All About Bad Business

Aswath Damodaran is a professor at the Stern School of Business at NYU. He goes in depth as to what constitutes a sector of bad businesses and then talks a little about what causes businesses to go bad. Whether it be:

  1. The corporate life cycle as Damodaran calls it including changes in capital structure, dividend policy and valuation challenges.
  2. Competitive changes, such as the expiration of a patent.
  3. Disruption by new companies or sectors, with given examples of Uber for the taxi industry and Amazon for the brick and mortar retailers.
  4. Macro delusion (see link for more on this).

There are really two main points that are discussed later on in his article that are great takeaways. The first is with regard to why these bad businesses will stay in operation and what their options are once they recognize that they are a bad business. The four options as discussed are:

  • Most obvious might be to sell the capital and exit the business, however, he argues that this may not be so simple since the capital will have been reassessed by investors and may not be worth selling anymore.
  • Option number two would be to return dividends to stockholders and shrink the business down by slowing or stopping investments back into the bad business.
  • The third possibility is just to continue running the business as is. This is an option not exactly because this is a good idea but more likely due to human behavior and people not wanting to give it up just yet and holding on waiting (and praying, as Damodaran writes,) for a miracle.
  • Another approach would be to follow what Yahoo is trying to do by bringing in Marissa Mayer. He notes this as aggressively attacking the bad business by drastically changing the way it operates and “a strategy, with the potential for high returns if you do succeed, but with low odds of success.”

 

The second important idea is in his closing thoughts where he talks about disruptions to whole sectors by new companies or ideas.

If we attach large values to the disruptors of existing businesses, consistency requires us to reassess the values of the disrupted companies. Thus, if we are bidding up the values of Tesla,  Uber and Google (driverless cars) because they might disrupt the automotive business, does it not stand to reason that we should be bidding down (at least collectively) the values of Volkswagen, Ford and Toyota?

We must understand that by giving weight and adding value to new businesses that we consider disruptors, we are in essence taking away value from the businesses that are the biggest players in the industry. However, as Damodaran points out,

we seem to be more willing to anoint the winners from disruption than we are in identifying and repricing the losers.

Link: Investing in Bad Businesses